muniom.blogg.se

Little black specs in sejda pdf editor
Little black specs in sejda pdf editor












little black specs in sejda pdf editor little black specs in sejda pdf editor

The codes info for the selected D is displayed below the table. Here is the font that does display properly - Noto Sans Italic. as I am writing I see Huelle just posted above.įlexiPDF (and Infix) Have a useful feature to remap characters.īut you can also use it to look at the codes behind various characters. So it is having issues trying to figure-out the embedded fonts.Īhh. In PDF-Exchange Editor it displays the Noto Sans KR Bold as Regular, and shows both Noto Sans KR Regular & Bold as not embedded. Note: I did check the fonts and did not find any issues. There is definitely some problems in this PDF. This seems to be a problem only with Adobe software I'm afraid The same issue also occurred on my laptop running Windows 10. I'm running the latest Publisher version on Windows 11. I haven't conducted any testing with other non-latin fonts but this may yield similar results. I think this may be a bug in the PDF exporter. Unchecking Embed subsets fixes the issue, at the expense of increasing file size from 1MB to almost 8MB (since the Korean font is quite large) ( Font Embed Example (non-subset).pdf) which is too large for some file upload limits.

little black specs in sejda pdf editor

The regular Noto Sans font however embeds perfectly well: However, when exporting the document as a PDF from Publisher with the Subset fonts option checked, the exported PDF ( Font Embed Example (subset).pdf) is missing all styles (i.e bold and regular) of only the KR font: afpub) using Noto Sans Korean Bold (Google Fonts) and Noto Sans (Google Fonts) but still only using Latin characters.īoth fonts are listed as 'Installable' in Windows font settings:














Little black specs in sejda pdf editor